On incorporation under law, a company becomes a separate legal entity as compared to its members. The company is different and distinct from its members in law. It has its own name and its own seal, its assets and liabilities are separate and distinct from those of its members. It is capable of owning property, incurring debt, borrowing money, having a bank account, employing people, entering into contracts and suing and being sued separately.
The importance of the separate entity of the company was however firmly established in the following case.
Salomon v. Salomon & co. Ltd.(1897) A.C. 22. S sold his boots business to a newly formed company for £ 30,000. His wife, one daughter and four sons took up one share of £ 1 each. S took 23,000 shares of £1 each and £ 10,000 debentures in the company. The debentures gave S a charge over the assets of the company as the consideration for the transfer of the business. Subsequently when the company was wound up, its assets were found to the worth £ 6,000 and its liabilities amounted to £ 17,000 of which £ 10,000 were due to S (secured by debentures) and £ 7,000 due to unsecured creditors, the unsecured creditors claimed that S and the company were one and the same person and that the company was a mere agent for S and was hence they should be paid in priority to S.
The importance of the separate entity of the company was however firmly established in the following case.
Salomon v. Salomon & co. Ltd.(1897) A.C. 22. S sold his boots business to a newly formed company for £ 30,000. His wife, one daughter and four sons took up one share of £ 1 each. S took 23,000 shares of £1 each and £ 10,000 debentures in the company. The debentures gave S a charge over the assets of the company as the consideration for the transfer of the business. Subsequently when the company was wound up, its assets were found to the worth £ 6,000 and its liabilities amounted to £ 17,000 of which £ 10,000 were due to S (secured by debentures) and £ 7,000 due to unsecured creditors, the unsecured creditors claimed that S and the company were one and the same person and that the company was a mere agent for S and was hence they should be paid in priority to S.
Held, the company was, in the eyes of the law, a separate person independent from S and was not his agent. S, though virtually the holder of all the shares in the company, was also a secured creditor and was entitled to repayment in priority to the unsecured creditors.
The company as aSeparate Legal Entity
Reviewed by Hosne
on
9:09 AM
Rating: